Box Score
BasketballAn objective approach to basketball analysis through the simplicity of the "Box Score" TM |
|
|
Adjusted Win Loss Records:Why adjust wins and losses? What if your team is tied in the standings after 20 games with another team at identical 13-7 records? Who is the "better" team? What if your team played a more difficult schedule. By this, we mean that there are a) more road games and b) more games against better teams. Here is how we adjust the win/loss percentage.We weight every win and loss. Let's say you play a team at HOME and win. If that team has a road winning percent of .510 then your win is weighted by that value. If that team has a road winning percent of .167 then your win is worth less and is weighted by that lower value. Same thing goes for the road: If your team wins in a place where the opponent wins .800 then your team gets rewarded using that higher weight. Also, if your team wins on the road against a subpar team (let's say .450 at home for them) then your team is reward less. Last Updated: FRI JAN 29 2010 - AM 4 Sections: Broken Down as Follows: Eastern Conference - Adjusted W-L % See how the Eastern Conference breaks down with adjusted wins and losses. Western Conference - Adjusted W-L % See how the Western Conference breaks down with adjusted wins and losses. Divisonal Standings - Adjusted W-L % See how each division breaks down with adjusted wins and losses. Largest Change from Real to Adjusted All NBA teams sorted by percent change from real to adjusted, w/commentary. EASTERN CONFERENCE: Sorted by Adjusted Win-Loss PercentageWhat does this sort result mean?This could be the best way to rank the Eastern Conference teams to date. Sorted by Weighted W-L % EAST ------- ADJUSTED -------- ----- REAL ------ Change # Team GP W L PCT GB W L PCT in Wins - ---- -- -- -- --- -- -- -- --- ------ 1 CLE 47 37.3 9.7 .794 36 11 .766 + 1.3 2 ATL 44 30.8 13.2 .699 5.1 29 15 .659 + 1.8 3 ORL 46 31.7 14.3 .689 5.1 30 16 .652 + 1.7 4 BOS 43 28.4 14.6 .661 6.9 29 14 .674 - 0.6 5 TOR 47 27.2 19.8 .579 10.1 25 22 .532 + 2.2 6 MIA 45 24.5 20.5 .543 11.9 23 22 .511 + 1.5 7 CHI 44 22.6 21.4 .513 13.2 22 22 .500 + 0.6 8 CHA 44 21.7 22.3 .494 14.1 22 22 .500 - 0.3 9 MIL 44 17.5 26.5 .398 18.3 19 25 .432 - 1.5 10 NYK 45 15.9 29.1 .354 20.4 18 27 .400 - 2.1 11 DET 44 14.6 29.4 .332 21.2 15 29 .341 - 0.4 12 WAS 44 13.2 30.8 .301 22.6 14 30 .318 - 0.8 13 PHI 45 13.1 31.9 .292 23.2 15 30 .333 - 1.9 14 IND 46 12.6 33.4 .274 24.2 16 30 .348 - 3.4 15 NJN 44 3.4 40.6 .077 32.5 4 40 .091 - 0.6 WESTERN CONFERENCE: Sorted by Adjusted Win-Loss PercentageWhat does this sort result mean?This could be the best way to rank the Western Conference teams to date. Sorted by Weighted W-L %. WEST ------- ADJUSTED -------- ----- REAL ------ Change # Team GP W L PCT GB W L PCT in Wins - ---- -- -- -- --- -- -- -- --- ------ 1 LAL 46 37.2 8.8 .809 35 11 .761 + 2.2 2 DEN 45 31.2 13.8 .693 5.5 31 14 .689 + 0.2 3 DAL 46 31.1 14.9 .677 6.1 30 16 .652 + 1.1 4 UTA 45 27.3 17.7 .607 9.4 27 18 .600 + 0.3 5 MEM 44 26.1 17.9 .594 10.1 25 19 .568 + 1.1 6 HOU 45 26.7 18.3 .593 10.0 24 21 .533 + 2.7 7 PHX 48 28.2 19.8 .586 10.1 27 21 .563 + 1.2 8 SAS 44 25.7 18.3 .583 10.6 26 18 .591 - 0.3 9 OKC 45 25.8 19.2 .573 10.9 24 21 .533 + 1.8 10 POR 47 26.1 20.9 .556 11.6 27 20 .574 - 0.9 11 NOK 45 24.4 20.6 .541 12.3 25 20 .556 - 0.6 12 LAC 45 19.4 25.6 .432 17.3 20 25 .444 - 0.6 13 SAC 44 15.4 28.6 .350 20.8 16 28 .364 - 0.6 14 GSW 44 11.1 32.9 .253 25.1 13 31 .295 - 1.9 15 MIN 47 7.8 39.2 .167 29.9 9 38 .191 - 1.2 Divisional Standings: Sorted by Adjusted Win-Loss PercentageWhat does this sort result mean?This could be the best way to rank the Divisions to date. Sorted by Weighted W-L %. EASTERN CONFERENCE Atlantic ------- ADJUSTED -------- ----- REAL ----- Change # Team W L PCT GB W L PCT in Wins - ---- -- -- --- --- --- --- ---- ---- 1 BOS 28.4 14.6 .661 29 14 .674 -0.57 2 TOR 27.2 19.8 .579 3.2 25 22 .532 +2.21 3 NYK 15.9 29.1 .354 13.5 18 27 .400 -2.08 4 PHI 13.1 31.9 .292 16.3 15 30 .333 -1.88 5 NJN 3.4 40.6 .077 25.6 4 40 .091 -0.62 Central ------- ADJUSTED -------- ----- REAL ----- Change # Team W L PCT GB W L PCT in Wins - ---- -- -- --- --- --- --- ---- ---- 1 CLE 37.3 9.7 .794 36 11 .766 +1.33 2 CHI 22.6 21.4 .513 13.2 22 22 .500 +0.59 3 MIL 17.5 26.5 .398 18.3 19 25 .432 -1.50 4 DET 14.6 29.4 .332 21.2 15 29 .341 -0.41 5 IND 12.6 33.4 .274 24.2 16 30 .348 -3.42 SouthEast ------- ADJUSTED -------- ----- REAL ----- Change # Team W L PCT GB W L PCT in Wins - ---- -- -- --- --- --- --- ---- ---- 1 ATL 30.8 13.2 .699 29 15 .659 +1.76 2 ORL 31.7 14.3 .689 0.1 30 16 .652 +1.69 3 MIA 24.5 20.5 .543 6.8 23 22 .511 +1.46 4 CHA 21.7 22.3 .494 9.0 22 22 .500 -0.26 5 WAS 13.2 30.8 .301 17.5 14 30 .318 -0.77 WESTERN CONFERENCE NorthWest ------- ADJUSTED -------- ----- REAL ----- Change # Team W L PCT GB W L PCT in Wins - ---- -- -- --- --- --- --- ---- ---- 1 DEN 31.2 13.8 .693 31 14 .689 +0.20 2 UTA 27.3 17.7 .607 3.9 27 18 .600 +0.33 3 OKC 25.8 19.2 .573 5.4 24 21 .533 +1.77 4 POR 26.1 20.9 .556 6.1 27 20 .574 -0.87 5 MIN 7.8 39.2 .167 24.4 9 38 .191 -1.16 Pacific ------- ADJUSTED -------- ----- REAL ----- Change # Team W L PCT GB W L PCT in Wins - ---- -- -- --- --- --- --- ---- ---- 1 LAL 37.2 8.8 .809 35 11 .761 +2.21 2 PHX 28.2 19.8 .586 10.1 27 21 .563 +1.15 3 LAC 19.4 25.6 .432 17.3 20 25 .444 -0.55 4 SAC 15.4 28.6 .350 20.8 16 28 .364 -0.59 5 GSW 11.1 32.9 .253 25.1 13 31 .295 -1.89 SouthWest ------- ADJUSTED -------- ----- REAL ----- Change # Team W L PCT GB W L PCT in Wins - ---- -- -- --- --- --- --- ---- ---- 1 DAL 31.1 14.9 .677 30 16 .652 +1.13 2 MEM 26.1 17.9 .594 4.0 25 19 .568 +1.14 3 HOU 26.7 18.3 .593 4.0 24 21 .533 +2.67 4 SAS 25.7 18.3 .583 4.5 26 18 .591 -0.35 5 NOK 24.4 20.6 .541 6.3 25 20 .556 -0.64 Sorted by Percent Change from actual W-L PCTWhat does this sort result mean?(sorted on last column) If an average team (record wise) is near the top, they should make a run for the playoffs If an average team is in the middle or near the bottom, do not expect to see them in the playoffs If a good team (record wise)is near the top, they are locked in for playoffs, and could even rise higher in standings If a good team is in the middle, expect them to remain where they are for the rest of the season If a good team is near the bottom, they may still make playoffs but expect a drop in the standings If a bad team (record wise)is near the top, expect them to challenge for that final playoff spot If a bad team is in the middle or near the bottom, expect their record to drop even further ----- REAL ----- ---- ADJUSTED ---- % CHANGE # TEAM W L PCT W L PCT FROM REAL - ---- -- -- --- --- --- --- ------ 1 HOU 24 21 .533 26.7 18.3 .593 +5.9% 2 LAL 35 11 .761 37.2 8.8 .809 +4.8% 3 TOR 25 22 .532 27.2 19.8 .579 +4.7% 4 ATL 29 15 .659 30.8 13.2 .699 +4.0% 5 OKC 24 21 .533 25.8 19.2 .573 +3.9% 6 ORL 30 16 .652 31.7 14.3 .689 +3.7% 7 MIA 23 22 .511 24.5 20.5 .543 +3.2% 8 CLE 36 11 .766 37.3 9.7 .794 +2.8% 9 MEM 25 19 .568 26.1 17.9 .594 +2.6% 10 DAL 30 16 .652 31.1 14.9 .677 +2.5% 11 PHX 27 21 .563 28.2 19.8 .586 +2.4% 12 CHI 22 22 .500 22.6 21.4 .513 +1.3% 13 UTA 27 18 .600 27.3 17.7 .607 +0.7% 14 DEN 31 14 .689 31.2 13.8 .693 +0.5% 15 CHA 22 22 .500 21.7 22.3 .494 -0.6% 16 SAS 26 18 .591 25.7 18.3 .583 -0.8% 17 DET 15 29 .341 14.6 29.4 .332 -0.9% 18 LAC 20 25 .444 19.4 25.6 .432 -1.2% 19 BOS 29 14 .674 28.4 14.6 .661 -1.3% 20 SAC 16 28 .364 15.4 28.6 .350 -1.3% 21 NJN 4 40 .091 3.4 40.6 .077 -1.4% 22 NOK 25 20 .556 24.4 20.6 .541 -1.4% 23 WAS 14 30 .318 13.2 30.8 .301 -1.8% 24 POR 27 20 .574 26.1 20.9 .556 -1.9% 25 MIN 9 38 .191 7.8 39.2 .167 -2.5% 26 MIL 19 25 .432 17.5 26.5 .398 -3.4% 27 PHI 15 30 .333 13.1 31.9 .292 -4.2% 28 GSW 13 31 .295 11.1 32.9 .253 -4.3% 29 NYK 18 27 .400 15.9 29.1 .354 -4.6% 30 IND 16 30 .348 12.6 33.4 .274 -7.4% - ---- -- -- --- --- --- --- ------ # TEAM W L PCT W L PCT FROM REAL ----- REAL ----- ---- ADJUSTED ---- % CHANGE |
|
|
|
Box Score
Basketball
An objective approach to basketball analysis through the simplicity of the "Box Score" TM
All contents copyright © 2006, 2007, Greg W. Lowe. All rights reserved. |