Box Score
BasketballAn objective approach to basketball analysis through the simplicity of the "Box Score" TM |
|
|
The NBA TOP 10: Making the Grade: FINAL RANKINGS# TEAM PTS Grade W L - ---- ---- ----- -- -- 1 SAS 89.0 B+ 56 26 2 NOK 88.6 B+ 56 26 3 LAL 88.2 B+ 57 25 4 HOU 87.8 B+ 55 27 5 PHX 86.8 B+ 55 27 6 BOS 86.2 B 66 16 7 UTA 85.6 B 54 28 8 DET 84.8 B 59 23 9 DAL 83.7 B 51 31 10 DEN 82.4 B- 50 32Through 7/5/08 11:49 AM - Complete List Below Our goal is to create a "Top 10" NBA team ranking by eliminating any advantage a team has by playing in an easy conference (currently West is much more difficult) or by playing an easy schedule. The goal is to create "classroom" grades. We determine the overall rankings of teams using the following method: * Win-Loss Record * Record against Eastern Conference. * Record against Western Conference. * RW-HL - Road Wins minus home losses * Adjusted WL%. * Strength of Schedule. Teams are then all normalized around 75 so "classroom" grades can be given to each team. The cut-off for +/- grades are 6.67 and 3.33 Complete List: vs E = Winning % vs. East RW-HL = Road Wins minus Home Losses ADJ WL = Adjusted WL PCT vs W = Winning % vs West STR = Strength of Schedule PVS & JuMP = Ranking on Saturday April 5 and "jump" made from then # TEAM PTS Grade W L PCT vs E vs W RW-HL ADJ WL STR PVS JMP - ---- ---- ---- -- -- --- ---- ---- ----- ----- --- --- --- 1 SAS 89.0 B+ 56 26 .683 .767 .635 +15 .739 .507 2 + 1 2 NOK 88.6 B+ 56 26 .683 .733 .654 +15 .728 .507 1 - 1 3 LAL 88.2 B+ 57 25 .695 .667 .712 +16 .731 .504 4 + 1 4 HOU 87.8 B+ 55 27 .671 .733 .635 +14 .713 .507 3 - 1 5 PHX 86.8 B+ 55 27 .671 .800 .596 +14 .701 .501 6 + 1 6 BOS 86.2 B 66 16 .805 .788 .833 +25 .812 .473 7 + 1 7 UTA 85.6 B 54 28 .659 .700 .635 +13 .685 .501 10 + 3 8 DET 84.8 B 59 23 .720 .712 .733 +18 .727 .479 5 - 3 9 DAL 83.7 B 51 31 .622 .600 .635 +10 .660 .503 9 0 10 DEN 82.4 B- 50 32 .610 .633 .596 +9 .634 .500 11 + 1 11 GSW 81.9 B- 48 34 .585 .667 .538 +7 .606 .504 8 - 3 12 ORL 80.0 B- 52 30 .634 .731 .467 +11 .634 .486 12 0 13 CLE 77.8 C+ 45 37 .549 .538 .567 +4 .554 .498 13 0 14 POR 77.5 C+ 41 41 .500 .500 .500 +0 .515 .511 14 0 15 SAC 75.8 C 38 44 .463 .567 .404 -3 .471 .512 15 0 16 WAS 74.6 C 43 39 .524 .558 .467 +2 .518 .491 18 + 2 17 PHI 73.9 C 40 42 .488 .481 .500 -1 .483 .497 16 - 1 18 TOR 73.4 C 41 41 .500 .558 .400 +0 .492 .494 17 - 1 19 ATL 69.2 D+ 37 45 .451 .462 .433 -4 .423 .487 19 0 20 NJN 68.0 D+ 34 48 .415 .500 .267 -7 .393 .495 23 + 3 21 IND 68.0 D+ 36 46 .439 .462 .400 -5 .410 .485 20 - 1 22 CHI 67.9 D+ 33 49 .402 .462 .300 -8 .380 .498 21 - 1 23 CHA 67.5 D+ 32 50 .390 .365 .433 -9 .365 .497 22 - 1 24 LAC 64.6 D 23 59 .280 .333 .250 -18 .255 .516 25 + 1 25 MIL 63.5 D 26 56 .317 .346 .267 -15 .289 .501 24 - 1 26 MEM 63.4 D 23 59 .280 .367 .231 -18 .241 .511 26 0 27 MIN 62.5 D- 21 61 .256 .267 .250 -20 .235 .514 27 0 28 SEA 62.1 D- 20 62 .244 .267 .231 -21 .215 .516 29 + 1 29 NYK 60.8 D- 23 59 .280 .385 .100 -18 .256 .501 28 - 1 30 MIA 56.2 F 15 67 .183 .154 .233 -26 .152 .503 30 0 - ---- ---- ---- -- -- --- ---- ---- ----- ----- --- # TEAM PTS Grade W L PCT vs E vs W RW-HL ADJ WL STR EASTERN CONFERENCE # TEAM PTS Grade W L PCT vs E vs W RW-HL ADJ WL STR - ---- ---- ---- -- -- --- ---- ---- ----- ----- --- 1 BOS 86.2 B 66 16 .805 .788 .833 + 25 .812 .473 2 DET 84.8 B 59 23 .720 .712 .733 + 18 .727 .479 3 ORL 80.0 B- 52 30 .634 .731 .467 + 11 .634 .486 4 CLE 77.8 C+ 45 37 .549 .538 .567 + 4 .554 .498 5 WAS 74.6 C 43 39 .524 .558 .467 + 2 .518 .491 6 PHI 73.9 C 40 42 .488 .481 .500 - 1 .483 .497 7 TOR 73.4 C 41 41 .500 .558 .400 0 .492 .494 8 ATL 69.2 D+ 37 45 .451 .462 .433 - 4 .423 .487 9 NJN 68.0 D+ 34 48 .415 .500 .267 - 7 .393 .495 10 IND 68.0 D+ 36 46 .439 .462 .400 - 5 .410 .485 11 CHI 67.9 D+ 33 49 .402 .462 .300 - 8 .380 .498 12 CHA 67.5 D+ 32 50 .390 .365 .433 - 9 .365 .497 13 MIL 63.5 D 26 56 .317 .346 .267 - 15 .289 .501 14 NYK 60.8 D- 23 59 .280 .385 .100 - 18 .256 .501 15 MIA 56.2 F 15 67 .183 .154 .233 - 26 .152 .503 - ---- ---- ---- -- -- --- ---- ---- ----- ----- --- # TEAM PTS Grade W L PCT vs E vs W RW-HL ADJ WL STR WESTERN CONFERENCE # TEAM PTS Grade W L PCT vs E vs W RW-HL ADJ WL STR - ---- ---- ---- -- -- --- ---- ---- ----- ----- --- 1 SAS 89.0 B+ 56 26 .683 .767 .635 + 15 .739 .507 2 NOK 88.6 B+ 56 26 .683 .733 .654 + 15 .728 .507 3 LAL 88.2 B+ 57 25 .695 .667 .712 + 16 .731 .504 4 HOU 87.8 B+ 55 27 .671 .733 .635 + 14 .713 .507 5 PHX 86.8 B+ 55 27 .671 .800 .596 + 14 .701 .501 6 UTA 85.6 B 54 28 .659 .700 .635 + 13 .685 .501 7 DAL 83.7 B 51 31 .622 .600 .635 + 10 .660 .503 8 DEN 82.4 B- 50 32 .610 .633 .596 + 9 .634 .500 9 GSW 81.9 B- 48 34 .585 .667 .538 + 7 .606 .504 10 POR 77.5 C+ 41 41 .500 .500 .500 0 .515 .511 11 SAC 75.8 C 38 44 .463 .567 .404 - 3 .471 .512 12 LAC 64.6 D 23 59 .280 .333 .250 - 18 .255 .516 13 MEM 63.4 D 23 59 .280 .367 .231 - 18 .241 .511 14 MIN 62.5 D- 21 61 .256 .267 .250 - 20 .235 .514 15 SEA 62.1 D- 20 62 .244 .267 .231 - 21 .215 .516 - ---- ---- ---- -- -- --- ---- ---- ----- ----- --- # TEAM PTS Grade W L PCT vs E vs W RW-HL ADJ WL STR |
|
|
|
Box Score
Basketball
An objective approach to basketball analysis through the simplicity of the "Box Score" TM
All contents copyright © 2006, ,2007, Greg W. Lowe. All rights reserved. |